Tổng quan hệ thống về đặc điểm tâm trắc của các công cụ đánh giá chứng sợ thiếu điện thoại di động

to 3 0 ye ar s o ld ) M ix ed m et ho ds α = .9 3 Cr on ba ch ’s A lp ha fo r t he th re e f ac to rs , r es pe ct iv el y α =. 90 , α = .7 7, an d α =. 7 1 N om op ho bi a Q ue sti on na ire (N M P- Q ) A l-B al ha n et al . (2 01 8) Ku w ai t 51 2 pa rt ic ip an ts (a ge d 21 .6 2± 4. 33 ye ar s, m ed ia n 20 ye ar s) M ix ed m et ho ds α = .8 8 Th e C FA d id n ot sh ow a co m pl et el y sa tis fa ct or y fit tin g w ith th e o rig in al fa ct or st ru ct ur e. Th e ex pl or at or y fa ct or an al ys is sh ow ed th at fo ur fa ct or s h ad 5 7. 24 % va ria nc e. 442 N am e o f i ns tr um en t A ut ho rs an d Pu bl ish ed y ea r Co un tr y Sa m pl e M et ho ds Ps yc ho m et ric s O ve ra ll Cr on ba ch ’s A lp ha In te rn al co ns ist en cy N om op ho bi a Q ue sti on na ire (N M P- Q ) M a & L iu (2 01 8) Ch in a 96 6 co lle ge stu de nt s M ix ed m et ho ds Th e fi nd in gs pr ov id e su pp or t f or th e ro bu stn es s o f th e s tr uc tu re of th e N M P- Q th ro ug h cr os s- cu ltu ra l va lid at io n Th e 2 0 ite m s o f a fo ur -fa ct or m od el de m on str at ed th e b es t fi t fo r t he co lle ct ed sa m pl e da ta . N om op ho bi a Q ue sti on na ire (N M P- Q ) A da w i e t a l. (2 01 8) Ita ly 40 3 pa rt ic ip an ts (th e a ve ra ge ag e of p ar tic ip an ts w as 2 7. 91 y ea rs ) Q ua nt ita tiv e m et ho d α = .9 5 α = .9 4, α = .8 9, an d α =. 88 fo r t he th re e fa ct or s. N om op ho bi a Q ue sti on na ire (N M P- Q ) Ra ng ka et al . (2 01 8) In do ne sia 52 0 pa rt ic ip an ts (r an gi ng fr om 18 to 6 5 ye ar s ol d) . Q ua nt ita tiv e m et ho d Th e q ua lit y of N M PQ it em s α = .9 9 Th e c on sis te nc y of th e an sw er s p ro vi de d by th e re sp on de nt s o r p er so na l re lia bi lit y (α = .9 3) is ap pr op ria te . N om op ho bi a Q ue sti on na ire (N M P- Q ) A rp ac i ( 20 19 ) Tu rk ey 48 5 un de rg ra du at e stu de nt s i n Tu rk ey Q ua nt ita tiv e m et ho d α =. 94 Cr on ba ch ’s A lp ha o f th e fo ur su bs ca le s: α =. 86 , α =. 84 , α = .9 2, α = .8 8 443 N am e o f i ns tr um en t A ut ho rs an d Pu bl ish ed y ea r Co un tr y Sa m pl e M et ho ds Ps yc ho m et ric s O ve ra ll Cr on ba ch ’s A lp ha In te rn al co ns ist en cy N om op ho bi a Q ue sti on na ire (N M P- Q ) G al ha rd o et al . (2 02 0) Po rt ug al 50 0 pa rt ic ip an ts (R an gi ng fr om 18 to 5 9 ye ar s ol d) . M ix ed m et ho ds α = .9 6 Th e N M P- Q -P T pr es en te d ex ce lle nt co ns ist en cy , c on str uc t an d di sc rim in an t v al id ity . N om op ho bi a Q ue sti on na ire (N M P- Q ) Fa rc ha kh et al . (2 02 1) Le ba no n 22 60 re sid en ts of th e c om m un ity ra nd om ly se le ct ed fr om Le ba no n’ s M oh af az at Q ua nt ita tiv e stu dy α = .9 48 to ta l v ar ia nc e e xp la in ed = 66 .6 5% fo r t he fo ur fa ct or s. N om op ho bi a Q ue sti on na ire (N M P- Q ) Le ón -M ej ía et al . ( 20 21 ) Sp ai n 50 12 pa rt ic ip an ts ag ed 1 2 to 2 4 ye ar s Q ua nt ita tiv e m et ho d Cr on ba ch ’s A lp ha o f th e fo ur su bs ca le s: α = .9 1, α =. 85 , α = .8 6, an d α = .7 7 O rig in al stu dy Q ue sti on na ire to A ss es s N om op ho bi a (Q A N P) O liv en ci a- Ca rr ió n et al . (2 01 8) Sp ai n 96 8 pa rt ic ip an ts Q ua nt ita tiv e m et ho d α = .8 0 EF A re ve al ed a th re e- fa ct or st ru ct ur e w ith 1 9% of th e v ar ia nc e f or fa ct or 1, 1 2% o f t he v ar ia nc e f or fa ct or 2 an d 10 % o f t he va ria nc e f or fa ct or 3 . 444 N am e o f i ns tr um en t A ut ho rs an d Pu bl ish ed y ea r Co un tr y Sa m pl e M et ho ds Ps yc ho m et ric s O ve ra ll Cr on ba ch ’s A lp ha In te rn al co ns ist en cy O rig in al stu dy N oS m ar tP ho ne Sc al e ( N SP S) G ur bu z & O zk an (2 01 9) Tu rk ey U ni ve rs ity stu de nt s Q ua nt ita tiv e m et ho d α = .9 2 Th e r el ia bi lit y co effi ci en ts of th e s ub -d im en sio ns : α =. 97 , α = .9 5, α = .9 4 an d α =. 92 . V al id at io n stu dy N oS m ar tP ho ne Sc al e ( N SP S) G ur bu z & O zk an (2 02 0) Tu rk ey 40 0 pa rt ic ip an ts be tw ee n th e a ge s of 1 8 an d 24 Q ua nt ita tiv e m et ho d α = .8 7 Re lia bi lit y co effi ci en ts of th e s ub -d im en sio ns α =. 84 , α = .7 6, α = .8 2 an d α =. 81 O rig in al stu dy In te ra ct iv e El ec tr on ic N om op ho bi a Te st (I EN T) Ka ze m et al . (2 02 1) O m an 12 11 st ud en ts ag ed b et w ee n 10 an d 18 y ea rs an d en ro lle d in gr ad es 5 –1 2 Q ua nt ita tiv e m et ho d α = .8 9 CF A s w er e c on du ct ed o n th e f ou r s ub sc al es an d th e in te rn al co ns ist en cy w as fo un d sa tis fa ct or ily 445 REFERENCES Al-Balhan, E. M., Khabbache, H., Watfa, A., Re, T. S., Zerbetto, R., & Bragazzi, N. L. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the nomophobia questionnaire: Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis–implications from a pilot study in Kuwait among university students. Psychology research and behavior management, 11, 471. DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/ PRBM.S169918 Elyasi, F., Hakimi, B., & Islami-Parkoohi, P. (2018). The validity and reliability of the Persian version of Nomophobia Questionnaire. Addiction & Health, 10(4), 231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22122/ahj.v10i4.647 Farchakh, Y., Hallit, R., Akel, M., Chalhoub, C., Hachem, M., Hallit, S., & Obeid, S. (2021). Nomophobia in Lebanon: Scale validation and association with psychological aspects. PLOS One, 16(4), e0249890. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249890 Ferri-García, R., Olivencia-Carrión, M. A., del Mar Rueda, M., Jiménez-Torres, M. G., & López-Torrecillas, F. (2019). Reliability and construct validity testing of a questionnaire to assess nomophobia (QANP). Escritos de Psicología- Psychological Writings,  12(2), 43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ espsiescpsi.v12i2.9982 Galhardo, A., Loureiro, D., Raimundo, E., Massano-Cardoso, I., & Cunha, M. (2020). Assessing nomophobia: validation study of the European Portuguese version of the Nomophobia Questionnaire.  Community Mental Health Journal,  56(8), 1521-1530. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10597-020-00600-z González-Cabrera, J., León-Mejía, A., Pérez-Sancho, C., & Calvete, E. (2017). Adaptation of the Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q) to Spanish in a sample of adolescents.  Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría,  45(4), 137-144. PMID: 28745386. Gurbuz, B., & Ozkan, G. (2019). A modern phobia: Development and validation of a nomophobia scale. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin: In Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00541-2 Kazem, A. M., Emam, M. M., Alrajhi, M. N., Aldhafri, S. S., AlBarashdi, H. S., & Al-Rashdi, B. A. (2021). Nomophobia in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence: the Development and Validation of a New Interactive Electronic Nomophobia Test. Trends in Psychology, 1-20. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s43076-021-00068-0 446 Lin, C. Y., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of Persian Nomophobia Questionnaire: Differential item functioning and measurement invariance across gender.  Journal of behavioral addictions, 7(1), 100-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.11 Moher, D, Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264-269. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151- 4-200908180-00135 So, H. J. (2012). Turning on mobile learning in Asia: Illustrative initiatives and policy implications. Policy focus: UNESCO working paper series on mobile learning, 1, 1-32. Yildirim, C. (2014). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Developing and validating a questionnaire using mixed methods research (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University). DOI: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ etd/14005 Yildirim, C., & Correia, A. P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2015.02.059 Yildirim, C., Sumuer, E., Adnan, M., & Yildirim, S. (2016). A growing fear: Prevalence of nomophobia among Turkish college students. Information Development, 32(5), 1322-1331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915599025